'Pleasure – Morality Essay\r'

' grinder is an heir of an intellect movement in England known as usefulism; utilitarianism is interested with the acquisition of amusement and body waste of pain. John Stuart move follows the guidelines of utilitarianism in order to decide if certain actions atomic number 18 moral. Utilitarianism states that a person should coiffe the action that produces the near pleasurable protrudecome for every person involved. In order to accurately judge if one pleasure is greater than an different, the person moldinessiness be sincere and have experienced both; such decide will prefer the higher pleasures over the disappoint ones.\r\nHowever, Mill recognizes that people ben’t always drive to follow moral social standards, because the crusades behind their actions depose be non solitary(prenominal) external simply congenital as well. What Mill means is that expectations of us from our peers and from a higher being, such as God, do not obligate us to follow these ru les beat out by society; it is our own expression within that holds us ac enumerateable to these standards. Lastly, Mill believes that in order to be a moral creature, we must obey the three conditions of utility: 1) Goodness is understood as production of happiness, elimination of pain, 2) for all of those implicated with the action, and 3) each counts for one and â€Å"no much than one. ”\r\nUtilitarian’s believe that a person’s actions are right if they produce happiness; â€Å"the greatest happiness of greatest number,”(Denise, Peterfreund, and White, p. 158). Michael, Peter and Samir are employees at Initech and are planning scamming the company by set up a computer virus that skims money out of the company’s bank account. Mill would olfactory property at this action by looking at the conditions of utilitarianism.\r\nAlthough they meet the first criteria of producing happiness with the elimination of pain by acquiring large amounts of money, they do not meet part two or three. In regards to part two, it does produce happiness for the ones instanter performing the scam but it in presently affects the opposite members working for Initech as well as stakeholders and so causes pain for those indirectly affected. Lastly, the third condition to count for one and scarce one is not met because a lot of people are involved. Mill withal considers that in order for an action to be moral, it must come from within.\r\nPeter, being the leader of this scam, has no internal morals or considerations for those around him. Michael and Samir are only involved in this scam because they are the brains in this operation and it wouldn’t be possible to perform this action otherwise. Mill believes that although people are incite by their own desires and they shouldn’t act on them. However, Peter, Michael, and Samir do just that. Mill thinks that when people are excessively fortunate that they are incapable of enjoying it because it only benefits themselves.\r\nThis goes to show that their scam is immoral because it only directly increases their happiness due to their own self-interests. Also, Mill argues that a person with high capacities will need more to make him happy and hence is capable of experiencing large quantities of pain; however, they still shouldn’t allow this to pooh-pooh their expectations and faculties. Although Peter has experienced a prolonged purpose of pain while working at Initech through tedious tasks and constant pressure from his eight bosses, this should not be a good enough causal agency for him to affect others’ faculties and reduce their worth as gay beings.\r\nMill says,” it is greater to be a gay dissatisfied than a pig satisfied,” (p. 162). In other words, Peter is not capable of experiencing the highest form of pleasure, and therefore chooses to increase the land pleasures, lowering his existence in the world. Many people who start off absent everything which is moral sometimes turn to selfish measures. The reason why so many people prohibit up becoming selfish is due to being in occupations that lower their aspirations of something greater; which may be a reason why Michael, Peter, and Samir choose to go through with this scam.\r\nThey are not unprejudiced decide because they do not know what higher pleasures lie in of; due to lack of opportunity. Considering all of these utilitarian schemes, Mill would argue that although on the surface Michael, Samir, and Peter expect to be acting immorally, they could possibly be unable to accurately judge both the higher and lower pleasures because they were not capable of enjoying the higher pleasures.\r\n'