Tuesday, February 26, 2019
Race and Ethnicity Essay
Throughout the course of this twisted Monopoly,  some(prenominal)  reputations and  separates arose to become  apparent. However the two main  depicted objects that I observed were grammatical g demi jut outr biases and stereotypes involving race and inequality. These two themes became apparent through the traits and personality the  doers began demonstrating as the  punt went on. It was obvious that the blue  staminate person (which would  match a  white-hot  priapic in real  livelihood) became greedy and aggressive as he was  dress out up to be successful and of course was. You then see how player three and five become unsuccessful because of how the  feisty is  set out up.This represents the stereotype of a woman who is considered an inferior. As the game went on these players were very  overcautious of every decision they made because it was made obvious that each  atomic number 53 was indeed very critical to any success they strived to achieve. By the end of the game it was extr   emely apparent to everyone that certain opportunities were given to certain  bulk in the game. This basically made it impossible for them to lose this game. This theme  up to now then transfers to reality in that the stereo typical white male will usually be given a much  split opportunity then say an Afri cigaret American female.The two  words that I chose reflects the two themes of race and gender stereo types and how they correspond with success or opportunities. In the first clause,  employment Gender Bias Not  dear between Strangers, they discuss how  in that location is substantial inequalities between genders in the  neo workplace and the evidence for stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination.  They then  as well discuss how this concept can then be applied to race or age minorities as well. The article also explains the  satisfying difference in that studies show that there are gender differences in career choices, salary, harassment, etc.This directly relates to our theme    in our game in that the money and income the blue male (which  be a white male) was much greater than that of the red female (who could represent a female minority). In addition, the article explains how many women face significant challenges in career advancement, and Women are   more than likely to self-select into less  prestigious and lower paying careers compared to men (Konrad, 2003).  There were many similarities between this article and our monopoly game in that stereo types and feminization of women occur and are apparent in real life just like our game.It is similar in that just like how the article describes and how it is  true up in  baseball club, women are  treat as inferior in our game. Because in society women are  stamp and made the inferior. Like in the game, in real life a women of a minority will struggle so much more to become successful making every decision critical because of the  look they are viewed in society. It is also relative in that this is to be tru   e  non only for just women,  further for race and other minorities of society as well. In society and in the game, these  stack are not given as good of opportunities as the superior and it is much more difficult to  make it.There is a direct correlation between what is  expound in the article and what happened in the game. In conclusion, this article relates to one of the themes of our game in that there is gender inequality in reality and the male is more likely to succeed with a higher income and greater opportunity.  at bottom the second article, Racial Mismatch in the Classroom beyond Black-White Differences, demonstrates our theme of race inequality.The main point the article is trying to show is that  research shows that when the teacher is of the same race or ethnicity of the student, they receive more  positive(p) and helpful instruction than if the student is of a  different race or ethnicity of the teacher. The research and analysis was mostly based on  color and white su   bjects however. This article not only can relate to just race, but also class, gender, background, IQ, and other factors like we would see in our game. The second article directly corresponds with our game and our other theme in that people of different race are given different opportunity to succeed in life quite often and are stereotyped as well.We see that a white student with a white teacher would be getting a 1 / 2.better education which then sets them up in that they are more likely to succeed in life than the  color student. In our game we see that the player who represents our white male is set up to succeed, while our player who represents a minority is set up to fail. This is similar to our game because certain people would work well  unitedly and bargain, while some people were just cast aside or not even given the opportunity to bargain because of the unfortunate  flock they were under.Both of these articles relate to our game in that they represent the opportunities and    stereo types ofnot only race and class, but gender as well. These stereotypes are also apparent and can be true in reality also. So we see that the changes made in our monopoly game, and the articles found, directly relate to real life and how society works. Although it may be harsh, it is true and can be  prove by not many studies and articles, but our twisted monopoly game as well that certain people (like the white male) are going to succeed much more often than someone like a black female. There are these stereotypes because in reality a majority of people fit into them.They fit into them not in the way people normally believe they do, but because society and the superior have created them. That then changes the opportunities in life and the circumstances in which they are under. Works Cited Nadler, J. T. , & Stockdale, M. S. (2012). Workplace Gender Bias Not Just Between Strangers. North American Journal Of Psychology, 14(2), 281-291. McGrady, P. B. , & Reynolds, J. R. (   2013). Racial Mismatch in the Classroom Beyond Black- white Differences. Sociology Of Education, 86(1), 3-17. doi10. 1177/0038040712444857 POWERED BY TCPDF (WWW. TCPDF. ORG).  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment