Are Parents Really to Blame for Their Kids’ Behavior?

Vanessa Ol discussion Mrs. Novak kinsfolk 17, 2012 Final Draft Are P atomic number 18nts Really to Blame for Their Kids Behavior? ceremony how children, or tied(p) teenagers my age, act, I wonder how or why their p atomic number 18nts permit them get away(predicate) with their conduct. What causes some kids to talk disrespectful to former(a)s or jumble temper tantrums for the littlest reasons? My p atomic number 18nts would tell me how, when they were my age, no matchless acted pop homogeneous how children do to twenty-four hours that p bents do non birth the morals or value that the antecedent generations have.After all, I mortalally would never allow my children to act in such ways. I started to research if parents were really to demonic for the way their children act, or if kids act in their own ways no matter how their parents raise them. At first I searched by dint of Google to see if I could expose names debating whether parents were really to blame for how their children acquit. Most of the results came out to be that parents were responsible and that children playacting out is usually because there is little discipline at home.I was not satisfied with only these results I felt that there are exceptions to how children behave that are not solely in result of how they were raised by their parents. School, location, ethnicity, age, and religious factors all influence how we behave. Children are like sponges-they model every(prenominal)thing a parent does and incorporate what they see into their own lives (Erikson 5). Reading this expression, I was about convinced that parents were actually really the main reason for children to act in the ways they do.After all, negative examples pot be unhealthy as a child go away mimic these and lead them to bad behavior. I keep to read on what types of factors would influence negative behavior. I found out social skills, stress, discipline, fighting, and child abuse are all major factors that children are exposed to that result in their behavior. Social skills, such as a simple please or thank you, preempt be positively influential to kids they will model what they witness their parents doing.According to the website More4Kids info, a parents reaction to stress affects the way a child reacts to stress (Erickson 6). If they consider they are the reason for yelling or lashing out, the child will some clippings shut him or herself fine-tune. Discipline, such as spanking or physically harming stars child, does not teach that child how to falsify their behavior time-outs are alternate forms of punishment that can change their behavior in a calm manner. Verbal and physical fights are extremely hard on kids.Children may develop low self-esteems and may sluice behave violently toward other children (Erickson 6). Sometimes when children are abused, they shut down and try to understand why they are getting abused. Reading through this phrase on how all these factors really influence how children act, I started to confide that mouthy children are the result of bad parenting. Still questioning if there were any(prenominal) other reasons for children to act out I continued to look at other articles online. According to Oxford University, poor parenting is not the reason for increased fuss behavior in kids.They found out that there is no world(a) decline in parenting. Parents and teenagers are choosing to spend to a greater extent quality time together than in 25 years ago (Oxford 3). The most fresh studies yield how parents now a-days are more likely to know where they children are compared to what they are doing in the 1980s. I found this information to be oddly surprising because I feel that parents were much stricter in earlier generations because compared to now. The most interesting article I found on who is to blame for childrens behavior is on The New York Times website.Dr. Richard A. Friedman, M. D. , talked about a patient he had that d ealt with depression and anxiety due to the fact that her son that had been a generally rude and unkind person his entire life. I hate to admit it, but he is unkind and unsympathetic to people, give tongue to his patient (Friedman 1). When tested, the results came back saying he was in the intellectually blue-ribbon(prenominal) range and that there was no evidence of any learning balk or mental illness. These same parents raised two other children who were socially and intellectually normal.How do parents raise two other well-behaved children maculation their other one turned out to be so misbehaved? When I read this, I felt that this was the truth. As I began to read the article Accepting That Good Parents May Plant boastful Seeds, distinguish of me agrees with Dr. Friedman sometimes good parents do have toxic children. Reading multiple articles inclination why parents are to blame for how their children act or how other factors can influence kids, I feel that both are to bl ame. On one hand, parents are to blame if their kids have no self-control and get away with acting out.But on the other hand, I feel that some kids are just bad kids they choose their own path to follow. For better or for worse, parents have limited power to influence their children. This is why they should not be so fast to take all the blame or quote for everything that their children become (Friedman 3). Vanessa Olson Mrs. Novak Annotated Bibliography 22 September 2012 A Selected Annotated Bibliography on Parents learn on Kids Behavior Friedman, Richard A, M. D. Accepting That Good Parents May Plant Bad Seeds. 12 July 2010. Web. 13 July 2010. http//www. nytimes. om/2010/07/13/health/13mind. html? _r=0 This article was published in the New York Times and Richard Friedman, M. D. , explains the experience he had with one of his patients. She claimed to be depressed due to her sons behavior. He duologue about how their one son is not a nice person but they managed to raise two ot her well-adjusted children. I gestate this article is helpful it explains how parents are not always the reason for how every child behaves. Also there is information of another set of parents who have been ignored by his son, having no phone calls or e-mails returned.The best part of this article is that it says that not everyone will turn out nice and loving, and that it is not necessarily because of parental behavior or their environment that they grew up in. Erickson, Rose. Parents heart on Child Behavior. 21 Jan. 2010. Web. 14 Sept. 2012. http//www. livestrong. com/article/75282-parents-effect-child-behavior/ In this article, parents are to blame for how their children act. It states how negative examples from parents have a great effect and can cause children to develop bad behavior. The author gives particular topics in day to day life that influence how one behaves.I think this article is multipurpose because out of all the articles about childrens bad behavior world a r esult of their parents, this has the best reasons why. I like how she used examples to show how each topic is the cause and that she backs up her statements. Also I like this article because Rose does not use words that exceed the reasonable reading level. Oxford University. Todays Parents Not to Blame for Teenage caper Behavior. 31 July 2009. Web. 14 Sept. 2012. This website talked about how most people believe that parents are much worse now than they were in earlier generations.It has statistics on how even though most believe it to be the other way around, teenagers and parents are much closer now than in earlier generations. Parents are more likely to know where their kids are and what they are doing. I found this article to be useful because it dialogue about how there are other factors, such as cell phones, television, and the internet, that can influence ones actions no matter how they were raised. I like this article mainly because it talks about what most articles do no t the comparison between earlier generations and this current one.